Hirsch v. Peekskill Ranch, Inc.
This text of 112 A.D.2d 191 (Hirsch v. Peekskill Ranch, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), dated July 26, 1984, which directed that a hearing be conducted to determine the receiver’s claim for reimbursement for necessary expenditures.
Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
An order directing a judicial hearing to aid in the disposi[192]*192tion of a motion does not affect a substantial right (see, CPLR 5701 [a] [2] [v]) and therefore is not appealable as of right (see, De Santis v De Santis, 107 AD2d 734; Warner v Warner, 88 AD2d 639; Bagdy v Progresso Foods Corp., 86 AD2d 589). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 A.D.2d 191, 491 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirsch-v-peekskill-ranch-inc-nyappdiv-1985.