Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Hirsch v. Peekskill Ranch, Inc.

Hirsch v. Peekskill Ranch, Inc.

112 A.D.2d 191, 491 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55941
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hirsch v. Peekskill Ranch, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 100 A.D.2d 863 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 8, 1985·Published

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), dated July 26, 1984, which directed that a hearing be conducted to determine the receiver’s claim for reimbursement for necessary expenditures.

Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

An order directing a judicial hearing to aid in the disposi[192]*192tion of a motion does not affect a substantial right (see, CPLR 5701 [a] [2] [v]) and therefore is not appealable as of right (see, De Santis v De Santis, 107 AD2d 734; Warner v Warner, 88 AD2d 639; Bagdy v Progresso Foods Corp., 86 AD2d 589). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hirsch v. Peekskill Ranch, Inc., 112 A.D.2d 191, 491 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55941 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

112 A.D.2d 191 (Hirsch v. Peekskill Ranch, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bagdy v. Progresso Foods Corp.
86 A.D.2d 589 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Warner v. Warner
88 A.D.2d 639 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
De Santis v. De Santis
107 A.D.2d 734 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)