Hirsch v. Kleinman

375 So. 2d 362
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 3, 1979
Docket79-1002
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 375 So. 2d 362 (Hirsch v. Kleinman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hirsch v. Kleinman, 375 So. 2d 362 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

375 So.2d 362 (1979)

Herman and Helen HIRSCH, Husband and Wife, Petitioners,
v.
Steven Z. KLEINMAN, M.D., Michael Sundar, M.D., and Hatem Eissa, M.D., Respondents.

No. 79-1002.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

October 3, 1979.

Angelo Marino, Jr., of Marino & Smith, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioners.

Hainline & Billing, Fort Lauderdale, and Edna L. Caruso, West Palm Beach, for respondent, Kleinman.

ON REHEARING

BERANEK, Judge.

This Court's prior opinion issued June 29, 1979, is withdrawn. This is a petition for common law certiorari in a medical mediation matter. Petitioners were the plaintiffs in the mediation procedure and respondents were medical doctors accused of negligence. The judicial referee denied a motion by petitioners to terminate jurisdiction of the panel. The motion was based on the failure to begin a hearing within six months from the filing of the claim under Section 768.44(3) Florida Statutes (1977).

The facts are that a "start-up" hearing was held shortly before the expiration of the six-month statutory period. This hearing occurred before the judicial referee and panel members but amounted to no more than plaintiffs' presenting certain hospital records in evidence. The hearing was then continued for approximately another six-month period. In accordance with Hewitt v. Caffee, 368 So.2d 1342 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), we hold this was not a hearing within the meaning of Section 768.44(3) and (6), Florida Statutes (1977). Hewitt has recently been followed in Wright v. Ratnesar, 373 So.2d 431 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

Certiorari is, therefore, granted and the order refusing to terminate jurisdiction is quashed. The matter is remanded and the Clerk of the Circuit Court is ordered to send a notice of termination to all parties pursuant to Florida Rule of Medical Mediation Procedure 20.190(c).

CERTIORARI GRANTED.

CROSS, SPENCER C., and DAUKSCH, JAMES C., Jr., Associate Judges, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roberts v. Casey
413 So. 2d 1226 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Parker v. Knorr
383 So. 2d 776 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Cicirelli v. Baptist Hospital
377 So. 2d 258 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Serrill v. Hilderbrand
382 So. 2d 316 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
375 So. 2d 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirsch-v-kleinman-fladistctapp-1979.