Hirsch v. Hirsch
This text of 40 A.D.3d 818 (Hirsch v. Hirsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the proposed intervenor, High Spruce Associates, LP, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Prus, J.), dated May 26, 2005, which denied its motion for leave to intervene.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied the motion of the proposed intervenor, High Spruce Associates, LP, as untimely (see Rectory Realty Assoc. v Town of Southampton, 151 AD2d 737, 737-738 [1989]; Matter of Buffalo Mall v Assessor of Town of Clarence, 101 AD2d 701 [1984]).
The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Crane, J.E, Krausman, Lifson and Baltin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
40 A.D.3d 818, 834 N.Y.S.2d 479, 835 N.Y.S.2d 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirsch-v-hirsch-nyappdiv-2007.