Hirsch v. Hirsch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hirsch v. Hirsch

40 A.D.3d 818, 834 N.Y.S.2d 479, 835 N.Y.S.2d 901

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 2007·Published

Opinion

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the proposed intervenor, High Spruce Associates, LP, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Prus, J.), dated May 26, 2005, which denied its motion for leave to intervene.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the motion of the proposed intervenor, High Spruce Associates, LP, as untimely (see Rectory Realty Assoc. v Town of Southampton, 151 AD2d 737, 737-738 [1989]; Matter of Buffalo Mall v Assessor of Town of Clarence, 101 AD2d 701 [1984]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Crane, J.E, Krausman, Lifson and Baltin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the proposed intervenor, High Spruce Associates, LP, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Prus, J.), dated May 26, 2005, which denied its motion for leave to intervene.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the motion of the proposed intervenor, High Spruce Associates, LP, as untimely (see Rectory Realty Assoc. v Town of Southampton, 151 AD2d 737, 737-738 [1989]; Matter of Buffalo Mall v Assessor of Town of Clarence, 101 AD2d 701 [1984]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Crane, J.E, Krausman, Lifson and Baltin, JJ., concur.

Hirsch v. Hirsch, 40 A.D.3d 818, 834 N.Y.S.2d 479, 835 N.Y.S.2d 901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

40 A.D.3d 818 (Hirsch v. Hirsch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related