Hirsch v. Hirsch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hirsch v. Hirsch

241 A.D. 675

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 241 A.D. 675 (Hirsch v. Hirsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hirsch v. Hirsch, 241 A.D. 675 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Orders reversed and motion denied. As plaintiff states that he will limit his proof to one specific act alleged in paragraph 4 of the complaint, the bill ordered was unnecessary. The plaintiff will have the right to rely upon the allegations of said paragraph to prove course of conduct. (Ketcham v. Ketcham, 32 App. Div. 26; Krauss v. Krauss, 73 id. 509.) Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders reversed and motion denied. As plaintiff states that he will limit his proof to one specific act alleged in paragraph 4 of the complaint, the bill ordered was unnecessary. The plaintiff will have the right to rely upon the allegations of said paragraph to prove course of conduct. (Ketcham v. Ketcham, 32 App. Div. 26; Krauss v. Krauss, 73 id. 509.) Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 A.D. 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirsch-v-hirsch-nyappdiv-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack