Hirsch v. Hirsch
This text of 67 Ill. App. 154 (Hirsch v. Hirsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion oe the Court.
These parties are husband and wife.
She filed a bill for separate maintenance, and he a cross-bill for a divorce. The court sustained the first, granting a separate maintenance and solicitor’s fees, upon the amount of which no question is made in appellant’s brief, and dismissed the cross-bill.
We are now asked to reverse the decision of the chancellor who saw and heard the witnesses, whose conflicting and irreconcilable testimony fills nearly two hundred pages of this record. This can not be done without violating established rules, and the decree is affirmed. Jenkins v. Cohen, 138 Ill. 634; Barrows v. Barrows, Ibid. 649; Duberstein v. Duberstein, 66 Ill. App. 579.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 Ill. App. 154, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirsch-v-hirsch-illappct-1896.