Hirsch v. Deschler
178 N.E. 799, 257 N.Y. 570, 1931 N.Y. LEXIS 952
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the contract relied upon by the defendant was so extraor *571 dinary as to be in excess of the authority of the plaintiff’s manager; no opinion.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hirsch v. Deschler, 178 N.E. 799, 257 N.Y. 570, 1931 N.Y. LEXIS 952 (N.Y. 1931).
178 N.E. 799 (Hirsch v. Deschler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
James Wood General Trading Establishment v. Jacques Coe
297 F.2d 651 (Second Circuit, 1961)
James Wood General Trading Establishment v. Coe
297 F.2d 651 (Second Circuit, 1961)
Hathcock v. MacKubin
170 A. 573 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1934)