Hirsch v. Coleman
This text of 190 Misc. 809 (Hirsch v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum The corporate landlord is an entity distinct from its sole stockholders and therefore does not come within the purview of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of section 209 of the Federal Housing and Rent Act of 1947 (U. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 1881 et seq.).
The final order should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with $30 costs to the tenant, and final order directed for the tenant.
MacCrate, Steinbeink and Fennelly, JJ., concur.
Final order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 Misc. 809, 78 N.Y.S.2d 685, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirsch-v-coleman-nyappterm-1948.