Hirsch v. Clower & Demming

759 So. 2d 720, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4998, 2000 WL 502522
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 28, 2000·No. No. 5D99-2949·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John A. Hirsch and Roland W. Zoila petition for a writ of certiorari to review an order denying their motion to abate an action in the circuit court by respondents, Clower & Demming, Daytona Ophthalmic Services, P.A., d/b/a Daytona Ophthalmic Services (DOS). We grant the petition, [721] issue the writ, and quash the order of denial.

The action below was initiated by DOS against Hirsch and Zoila, and sought a declaratory judgment as to the legality of the same contracts involved in this court’s opinion in Hirsch v. DiGaetano, 732 So.2d 1177 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). DOS was also a party in that previous case and appealed after the complaint was amended in the circuit court to add DOS as a party. We previously ruled that an action involving the same issues and parties had been filed in a Massachusetts court and the principle of priority compelled that a -later filed Florida action be stayed. We have not changed our opinion.

PETITION GRANTED; WRIT ISSUED; ORDER QUASHED; REMANDED.

W. SHARP, HARRIS and PETERSON, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hirsch v. Clower & Demming, 759 So. 2d 720, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4998, 2000 WL 502522 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

759 So. 2d 720 (Hirsch v. Clower & Demming) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hirsch v. DiGaetano
732 So. 2d 1177 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)