Hirsch v. 66-74 Court Street Realty Corp.

236 A.D. 694

This text of 236 A.D. 694 (Hirsch v. 66-74 Court Street Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hirsch v. 66-74 Court Street Realty Corp., 236 A.D. 694 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Order granting respondent’s motion to open default reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The default was willful and no reasonable excuse was presented therefor. Moreover, the proposed answer, is insufficient in law. (Title Guarantee & T. Co. v. 457 Schenectady Ave., Inc., ante, p. 509; Commonwealth Mortgage Co. v. De Waltoff, 135 App. Div. 33, 34; Ettlinger v. P. R. & C. Co., 142 N. Y. 189; Cumming v. Middletown, Unionville & W. G. R. R. Co., 147 App. Div. 105.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ettlinger v. Persian Rug & Carpet Co.
36 N.E. 1055 (New York Court of Appeals, 1894)
Commonwealth Mortgage Co. v. De Waltoff
135 A.D. 33 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
Cumming v. Middletown, Unionville & Water Gap Railroad
147 A.D. 105 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 A.D. 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirsch-v-66-74-court-street-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1931.