Hirricane Import Co. v. United States

50 Cust. Ct. 444
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedApril 16, 1963
DocketReap. Dec. 10487; Entry No. 19918, etc.
StatusPublished

This text of 50 Cust. Ct. 444 (Hirricane Import Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hirricane Import Co. v. United States, 50 Cust. Ct. 444 (cusc 1963).

Opinion

Wilson, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the above-enumerated appeal for reappraisement on stipulation, reading as follows:

1. That this stipulation is limited to the merchandise marked “R” and initialed OF (Examiner’s Initials) by Examiner O. Fleischman (Examiner’s Name) on the invoices covered by the appeals for reappraisement enumerated on Schedule “A” hereto annexed.
2. That as so limited, the merchandise and the issues are the same in all material respects as those involved in United States v. Githin Co., A.R.D. 132, and that the record in the cited case may be incorporated in the record herein.
3. That the involved merchandise was entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption prior to the effective date of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54521).
4. At the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold for exportation to the United States to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of [445]*445trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the appraised values, less the items described on the invoices under the heading “Actual Charges”.
5. That the above-entitled appeal for reappraisement may be submitted on this stipulation, the same being limited to the merchandise and the issues described hereinabove and abandoned in all other respects.

On the agreed facts and following the decision in the cited case, I find and hold that export values as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1030, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the merchandise described above and that such values were as set forth in item 4 of stipulation.

As to all other merchandise, the values found by the appraiser are held to be the correct values of the merchandise. Judgment will issue accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 Cust. Ct. 444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirricane-import-co-v-united-states-cusc-1963.