Hirpassa v. Prince George's County Government

406 F. App'x 739
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 30, 2010·No. No. 10-1828·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wellela Hirpassa appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendants on Hirpassa’s complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hirpassa v. Prince George’s County, No. 8:09-cv-02631-RWT, 2010 WL 2730651 (D.Md. July 9, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hirpassa v. Prince George's County Government, 406 F. App'x 739 (4th Cir. 2010).

406 F. App'x 739 (Hirpassa v. Prince George's County Government) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related