Hirn v. Behrer
This text of 175 A.D. 900 (Hirn v. Behrer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It would seem that the plaintiff intentionally suffered his default to be taken after failure of his forecast when his case, then on the ready calendar, would be reached for trial. The terms imposed are too light. The order is, therefore, modified to make the opening of the default conditioned upon the payment of forty dollars, and as so modified it is affirmed, without costs, but with disbursements to the appellant. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
175 A.D. 900, 160 N.Y.S. 1133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirn-v-behrer-nyappdiv-1916.