Hirdhani v. State

96 So. 3d 1057, 2012 WL 3822131, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14812
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 5, 2012·No. No. 2D12-1023·Published

Opinion

CASANUEVA, Judge.

Jonathan Hirdhani appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Crim[1058]*1058inal Procedure 3.850. Mr. Hirdhani raised two grounds in his motion, but the post-conviction court correctly denied the motion as untimely.

As we did in Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011), we hold that Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively in postconviction proceedings, and we certify the following question of great public importance:

SHOULD THE RULING IN PADILLA V. KENTUCKY, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY IN POSTCONVICTION PROCEEDINGS?

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND and CRENSHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hirdhani v. State, 96 So. 3d 1057, 2012 WL 3822131, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14812 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

96 So. 3d 1057 (Hirdhani v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Padilla v. Kentucky
559 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Barrios-Cruz v. State
63 So. 3d 868 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)