Hirdes v. Fanning

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hirdes v. Fanning

40 A.D.2d 716, 337 N.Y.S.2d 265, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3595

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 30, 1972

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 40 A.D.2d 716 (Hirdes v. Fanning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hirdes v. Fanning, 40 A.D.2d 716, 337 N.Y.S.2d 265, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3595 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal and property injuries, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rock-land County, entered July 14, 1970, in favor of defendants, after a nonjury trial. Judgment affirmed as to plaintiffs Jean Hirdes and Thomas Hirdes, Jr., with costs. Appeal by plaintiff Virginia Hirdes dismissed, without costs. Although the notice of appeal was filed apparently on behalf of all plaintiffs, it appears from the statement made pursuant to CPLR 5531 that plaintiff Virginia Hirdes died before the trial. No executor or administrator was substituted for her as a party plaintiff. Under the circumstances, the judgment as to her is a nullity and the appeal from the judgment must be dismissed insofar as it relates to her (Goldbard v. Kirchik, 20 A D 2d 725; Barnes v. Chrysler Leasing Corp., 37 A D 2d 851). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Munder, Shapiro, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal and property injuries, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rock-land County, entered July 14, 1970, in favor of defendants, after a nonjury trial. Judgment affirmed as to plaintiffs Jean Hirdes and Thomas Hirdes, Jr., with costs. Appeal by plaintiff Virginia Hirdes dismissed, without costs. Although the notice of appeal was filed apparently on behalf of all plaintiffs, it appears from the statement made pursuant to CPLR 5531 that plaintiff Virginia Hirdes died before the trial. No executor or administrator was substituted for her as a party plaintiff. Under the circumstances, the judgment as to her is a nullity and the appeal from the judgment must be dismissed insofar as it relates to her (Goldbard v. Kirchik, 20 A D 2d 725; Barnes v. Chrysler Leasing Corp., 37 A D 2d 851). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Munder, Shapiro, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 716, 337 N.Y.S.2d 265, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirdes-v-fanning-nyappdiv-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack