Hiram Miles v. State
This text of Hiram Miles v. State (Hiram Miles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by: Karen Angelini, Justice
Sitting: Tom Rickhoff, Justice
Paul W. Green, Justice
Karen Angelini, Justice
Delivered and Filed: March 3, 1999
AFFIRMED
Hiram Miles was convicted by jury of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. Miles' court-appointed attorney has filed a brief in which he raises two arguable points of error, but nonetheless concludes that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). The brief meets the requirements of Anders. Counsel has provided Miles with a copy of the brief and advised him of his right to review the record and file a pro se brief. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1997, no pet.). Miles has not filed a brief.
After reviewing the record and counsel's brief, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and
without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed, and counsel's motion to withdraw is
granted. Nichols, 954 S.W.2d at 86.
Karen Angelini, Justice
DO NOT PUBLISH
Return to
Fourth Court of Appeals
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hiram Miles v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hiram-miles-v-state-texapp-1999.