Hira Azhar v. Mohammad Ali Choudhri

Court of Appeals of Texas

Hira Azhar v. Mohammad Ali Choudhri

DecidedSeptember 1, 2022

Docket01-20-00169-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Hira Azhar v. Mohammad Ali Choudhri (Hira Azhar v. Mohammad Ali Choudhri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hira Azhar v. Mohammad Ali Choudhri, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Hira Azhar v. Mohammad Ali Choudhri Appellate case number: 01-20-00169-CV Trial court case number: 2015-36895 Trial court: 312th District Court of Harris County

This case has been reset for in person oral argument on Wednesday, October 19, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. The parties are ordered to file supplemental briefing on the issues identified below in advance of oral argument. Both appellant’s and appellee’s supplemental briefs shall be due no later than 21 days from the date of this order, or Thursday, September 22, 2022. The supplemental briefing should be limited to the identified issues and may not, without leave of court, be longer than 5,000 words if computer-generated and 15 pages if not. The parties are also instructed to be prepared to discuss the following issues at oral argument: 1. Has there been a determination of ownership of marital property made by any court in any jurisdiction? 2. Has there been a division of marital property made by any court in any jurisdiction? 3. Did the Pakistani courts have jurisdiction to divide marital property located in Texas? 4. If there has been no division of martial property, and assuming Appellant’s property division claims under Chapter 9 of the Family Code are barred by res judicata, who holds title to the marital property? What effect does a finding that Appellant’s Chapter 9 property division claims are barred by res judicata have on the ownership of the marital property? 5. Assuming Appellant’s property division claims under Chapter 9 of the Family Code are barred by res judicata, would Appellant be prohibited from pursuing separate partition claims under Chapter 23 of the Property Code as a tenant in common? The parties should expect to address at oral argument the remainder of the legal arguments presented in their respective briefs. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Amparo Guerra Acting Individually

Date: September 1, 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Hira Azhar v. Mohammad Ali Choudhri Appellate case number: 01-20-00169-CV Trial court case number: 2015-36895 Trial court: 312th District Court of Harris County

This case has been reset for in person oral argument on Wednesday, October 19, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. The parties are ordered to file supplemental briefing on the issues identified below in advance of oral argument. Both appellant’s and appellee’s supplemental briefs shall be due no later than 21 days from the date of this order, or Thursday, September 22, 2022. The supplemental briefing should be limited to the identified issues and may not, without leave of court, be longer than 5,000 words if computer-generated and 15 pages if not. The parties are also instructed to be prepared to discuss the following issues at oral argument: 1. Has there been a determination of ownership of marital property made by any court in any jurisdiction? 2. Has there been a division of marital property made by any court in any jurisdiction? 3. Did the Pakistani courts have jurisdiction to divide marital property located in Texas? 4. If there has been no division of martial property, and assuming Appellant’s property division claims under Chapter 9 of the Family Code are barred by res judicata, who holds title to the marital property? What effect does a finding that Appellant’s Chapter 9 property division claims are barred by res judicata have on the ownership of the marital property? 5. Assuming Appellant’s property division claims under Chapter 9 of the Family Code are barred by res judicata, would Appellant be prohibited from pursuing separate partition claims under Chapter 23 of the Property Code as a tenant in common? The parties should expect to address at oral argument the remainder of the legal arguments presented in their respective briefs. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Amparo Guerra Acting Individually

Date: September 1, 2022

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Hira Azhar v. Mohammad Ali Choudhri, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hira-azhar-v-mohammad-ali-choudhri-texapp-2022.