Hippolyte v. State
782 So. 2d 941, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4037, 2001 WL 313871
Opinion
We accept the state’s concession that it was error to enter equal concurrent sentences under both the Prison Releasee Reoffender Punishment Act and the habitual felony offender statutes. See Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000). We therefore strike the habitual offender designa[942]*942tion. See Green v. State, 782 So.2d 416 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).
Conviction affirmed; prison releasee reoffender sentence affirmed; habitual offender designation stricken.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hippolyte v. State, 782 So. 2d 941, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4037, 2001 WL 313871 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
782 So. 2d 941 (Hippolyte v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Green v. State
782 So. 2d 416 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Grant v. State
770 So. 2d 655 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)