Hippodrome Bldg. Co. v. Commissioner

1965 T.C. Memo. 25, 24 T.C.M. 113, 1965 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 305
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedFebruary 11, 1965
DocketDocket Nos. 95333, 95334.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1965 T.C. Memo. 25 (Hippodrome Bldg. Co. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hippodrome Bldg. Co. v. Commissioner, 1965 T.C. Memo. 25, 24 T.C.M. 113, 1965 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 305 (tax 1965).

Opinion

The Hippodrome Building Company, a corporation v. Commissioner. Edwin I. Bamberger and Rita Bamberger v. Commissioner.
Hippodrome Bldg. Co. v. Commissioner
Docket Nos. 95333, 95334.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1965-25; 1965 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 305; 24 T.C.M. (CCH) 113; T.C.M. (RIA) 65025;
February 11, 1965
Elmer J. Babin, 1220 Huron Rd., Cleveland, Ohio, for the petitioners. Joseph P. Crowe, for the respondent.

DAWSON

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

DAWSON, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies in the income tax of petitioners for the years and in the amounts as follows:

DocketTaxableDefi-
No.Petitioneryearciency
95333Hippodrome Building
Co.1956$7,439.90
19576,108.72
19585,277.77
19594,527.86
95334Edwin I, and Rita Bam-
berger19571,893.40
The sole issue for decision in these consolidated cases is whether certain instruments, issued by the Hippodrome Building Company and designated as debentures, represent a bona fide indebtedness on the part of*306 the company or whether they merely manifest a proprietary equity on the part of the holders thereof.

Findings of Fact

Some of the facts were stipulated by the parties. Their stipulation, together with attached exhibits, is incorporated herein by this reference.

The Hippodrome Building Company (hereinafter sometimes referred to as Hippodrome) is an Ohio corporation, having its principal place of business in Cleveland, Ohio. Its Federal corporation income tax returns for the calendar years 1956 through 1959, made on the accrual basis, were filed with the district director of internal revenue, Cleveland, Ohio. Edwin I. and Rita Bamberger are husband and wife residing in Cleveland, Ohio. Their joint Federal income tax return for the year 1957, made on the cash basis and for the calendar year period, was filed with the district director of internal revenue, Cleveland, Ohio.

The Hippodrome Building Company was originally organized on March 9, 1912, and has been in continuous existence since that date. Its principal asset was and is the Hippodrome Building, a substantial commercial structure located in Cleveland, Ohio, which houses, among others, an office building and a theatre. *307 On April 15, 1947, pursuant to an agreement between Alfred G. Vanderbilt (hereinafter referred to as Vanderbilt) and Stuart Scheftel (hereinafterreferred to as Scheftel), Howard A. Lockwood, as nominee of Vanderbilt, acquired 10,000 shares of the common stock of Hippodrome, representing all of its then, issued and outstanding shares. Of the 10,000 shares, 9,995 were issued in the name of Howard A. Lockwood and the remaining five shares were issued to others. On June 9, 1948, the Articles of Incorporation of Hippodrome were amended and the company was reorganized by retiring all of its capital shares of stock outstanding and substituting therefor 25,000 shares of stock as follows:

11,350 First Preferred Shares:

Par Value $100.00 per share

Preferred Dividend; quarterly at rate of $4.00 per share cumulatively;

Redeemable: $100.00 per share plus accrued dividends;

Issued to: Howard A. Lockwood (as nominee of Alfred G. Vanderbilt)

3,650 Second Preferred Shares:

No par value - stated value, $.10 per share;

Preferred Dividend: quarterly rate of $4.00 per share to become cumulative and payable after all First Preferred shall have been redeemed.

Redeemable after redemption*308 of First Preferred, at $100.00 per share;

Issued to: Alfred G. Vanderbilt

5,000 Third Preferred Shares:

No par value - stated value $.05 per share;

Preferred Dividend: quarterly at the rate of $4.00 per annum per share, not to become cumulative or payable until all the Frist Preferred Shares had been retired; thereafter to accrue and become cumulative while the Second Preferred Shares were outstanding but not to be paid until all the Second Preferred Shares had been retired.

Redeemable after redemption of both First and Second Preferred, at $100.00 per share

Issued to: Stuart Scheftel

5,000 Common Shares:

No par value - stated value $.01 per share;

Issued to: 2,500 shares to Alfred G. Vanderbilt; 2,500 shares to Stuart Scheftel

Dividends: Payable only after all preferred shares had been redeemed.

Voting rights in Hippodrome were held exclusively by the holders of the First Preferred Shares until they were retired; thereafter by the holders of the Second Preferred and Common Shares on the basis of one vote for each share. Holders of the Third Preferred Shares at no time had any voting rights. Thus, immediately after the reorganization and pursuant thereto Vanderbilt*309 possessed voting control of Hippodrome.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Colony, Inc. v. Commissioner
357 U.S. 28 (Supreme Court, 1958)
RC Owen Company v. United States
180 F. Supp. 369 (Court of Claims, 1960)
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Proctor Shop
82 F.2d 792 (Ninth Circuit, 1936)
Fellinger v. United States
238 F. Supp. 67 (N.D. Ohio, 1964)
Gooding Amusement Co. v. Commissioner
23 T.C. 408 (U.S. Tax Court, 1954)
Colony, Inc. v. Commissioner
26 T.C. 30 (U.S. Tax Court, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1965 T.C. Memo. 25, 24 T.C.M. 113, 1965 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hippodrome-bldg-co-v-commissioner-tax-1965.