Hipple v. Laird

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Hipple v. Laird

42 A. 46, 189 Pa. 472, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 671

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 3, 1899

DocketAppeal, No. 204

StatusPublished

Cited by15 cases

This text of 42 A. 46 (Hipple v. Laird) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hipple v. Laird, 42 A. 46, 189 Pa. 472, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 671 (Pa. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam,

The learned judge of the court below refused to open the judgment in this case because he did not consider the affidavit of defense sufficient to prevent judgment. That was a very good reason for refusing to open the judgment. Upon exam[474]*474ining the affidavit we find that it was insufficient to prevent judgment for the very reasons stated in the opinion of the court. That being so, there was no error in the refusal of the court to open the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam,

The learned judge of the court below refused to open the judgment in this case because he did not consider the affidavit of defense sufficient to prevent judgment. That was a very good reason for refusing to open the judgment. Upon exam[474]*474ining the affidavit we find that it was insufficient to prevent judgment for the very reasons stated in the opinion of the court. That being so, there was no error in the refusal of the court to open the judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 A. 46, 189 Pa. 472, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hipple-v-laird-pa-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack