Hipple v. Laird

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Hipple v. Laird

42 A. 46, 189 Pa. 472, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 671

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 3, 1899·No. Appeal, No. 204·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam,

The learned judge of the court below refused to open the judgment in this case because he did not consider the affidavit of defense sufficient to prevent judgment. That was a very good reason for refusing to open the judgment. Upon exam[474]*474ining the affidavit we find that it was insufficient to prevent judgment for the very reasons stated in the opinion of the court. That being so, there was no error in the refusal of the court to open the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam,

The learned judge of the court below refused to open the judgment in this case because he did not consider the affidavit of defense sufficient to prevent judgment. That was a very good reason for refusing to open the judgment. Upon exam[474]*474ining the affidavit we find that it was insufficient to prevent judgment for the very reasons stated in the opinion of the court. That being so, there was no error in the refusal of the court to open the judgment.

Hipple v. Laird, 42 A. 46, 189 Pa. 472, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 671 (Pa. 1899).

Pincite

42 A. 46 (Hipple v. Laird) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related