Hipple v. De Puie

Illinois Supreme Court

Hipple v. De Puie

51 Ill. 528

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 15, 1869

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 51 Ill. 528 (Hipple v. De Puie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hipple v. De Puie, 51 Ill. 528 (Ill. 1869).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Lawrence

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The counsel for appellant makes but two points in his brief: First, that the plaintiff was not a competent witness under the statute ; and, Second, that there was no evidence of a conversion. In regard to the first, it need only be said that the question of plaintiff’s competency as a witness, was not raised in the court below ; and as to the second, the plaintiff swore to_ facts amounting to a .conversion, and - the jury thought proper to believe her.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Lawrence

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The counsel for appellant makes but two points in his brief: First, that the plaintiff was not a competent witness under the statute ; and, Second, that there was no evidence of a conversion. In regard to the first, it need only be said that the question of plaintiff’s competency as a witness, was not raised in the court below ; and as to the second, the plaintiff swore to_ facts amounting to a .conversion, and - the jury thought proper to believe her.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 Ill. 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hipple-v-de-puie-ill-1869.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack