Hipple v. De Puie
51 Ill. 528
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court:
The counsel for appellant makes but two points in his brief: First, that the plaintiff was not a competent witness under the statute ; and, Second, that there was no evidence of a conversion. In regard to the first, it need only be said that the question of plaintiff’s competency as a witness, was not raised in the court below ; and as to the second, the plaintiff swore to_ facts amounting to a .conversion, and - the jury thought proper to believe her.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hipple v. De Puie, 51 Ill. 528 (Ill. 1869).
51 Ill. 528 (Hipple v. De Puie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Faunce v. Woods
5 F.2d 753 (D.C. Circuit, 1925)
Bertolet v. Stoner
164 Ill. App. 605 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1911)
Becker v. Foster
64 Ill. App. 192 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1896)