Hippel v. Hippel

Supreme Court of Florida

Hippel v. Hippel

9 So. 2d 927, 151 Fla. 546, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1213

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 13, 1942·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the final decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree. It is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the *547 Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the final decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree. It is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the *547 Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Hippel v. Hippel, 9 So. 2d 927, 151 Fla. 546, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1213 (Fla. 1942).

Pincite

9 So. 2d 927 (Hippel v. Hippel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.