Hipolito Alvarez v. State
This text of Hipolito Alvarez v. State (Hipolito Alvarez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-11-0129-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL D
AUGUST 16, 2011 ______________________________
HIPOLITO ALVAREZ,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee _______________________________
FROM THE 181st DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;
NO. 58,169-B; HON. JOHN BOARD, PRESIDING _______________________________
ABATEMENT AND REMAND _______________________________
Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.
Hipolito Alvarez, appellant, appeals his conviction for sexual abuse of a child.
Appellant timely perfected his appeal. The clerk’s record was filed on May 10, 2011, and
the reporter’s record on June 24, 2011. Appellant’s brief was due on July 25, 2011.
The brief was not filed by that date and on August 2, 2011, the court notified counsel
that she had until August 12, 2011, to either file appellant’s brief or file an extension
motion. To date, neither a brief nor an extension motion has been received by the
court. Those convicted of criminal acts are entitled to effective assistance of counsel on
appeal. The failure of counsel to timely prosecute an appeal falls short of rendering
such assistance. Consequently, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the
181st District Court of Potter County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand,
the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter,
conduct a hearing to determine 1) whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, 2)
whether appellant is indigent and entitled to appointed counsel, and 3) whether
appellant’s current attorney was appointed or retained. The trial court is ordered to
execute pertinent findings of fact on these matters. Should it be found that appellant
desires to pursue the appeal, is indigent, and his current legal counsel was appointed,
then the trial court is ordered to remove appellant’s current legal counsel and appoint
another to zealously represent appellant’s interest on appeal. The name, address,
phone number, telefax number, and state bar number of the new attorney must also be
included in the court's findings of fact and conclusions of law. Lastly, the trial court shall
also cause to be developed 1) a supplemental clerk's record containing the findings of
fact and conclusions of law and 2) a reporter's record transcribing the evidence and
argument presented at the aforementioned hearing. The foregoing supplemental clerk's
and reporter’s records must be filed by the trial court with the clerk of this court on or
before September 15, 2011. Should additional time be needed to perform these tasks,
the trial court may request same on or before September 15, 2011.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam Do not publish. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hipolito Alvarez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hipolito-alvarez-v-state-texapp-2011.