Hipage Co. v. United States

49 Cust. Ct. 356, 1962 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1362
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJuly 12, 1962
DocketReap. Dec. 10298; Entry No. A-242, etc.
StatusPublished

This text of 49 Cust. Ct. 356 (Hipage Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hipage Co. v. United States, 49 Cust. Ct. 356, 1962 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1362 (cusc 1962).

Opinion

OliveR, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, are before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the respective parties herein, subject to the approval of the Court:
1. That the merchandise involved in the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in Schedule A attached consists of birch plywood exported from Finland;
2. That such merchandise is on the Final List, T.D. 54521, and is subject to duty on the basis of export value under Section 402a (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165; and that said export value is in every case the appraised value less ocean freight and insurance as stated on the attached Schedule B ;
3. That no higher foreign value under Section 402a(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, existed at the time of exportation of the involved merchandise;
4. That the appeals for reappraisement noted hereon are deemed submitted for decision upon the foregoing stipulations; and that Plaintiff abandons its appeal as to all other merchandise contained in the said appeals for reap-praisement.

On tbe agreed facts, I find that tbe proper basis for appraisement of tbe bircli plywood in question is statutory export value and bold that such value for tbe present merchandise is, in every case, tbe appraised value, less ocean freight and insurance as set forth in schedule “B,” hereto attached and made a part hereof.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 Cust. Ct. 356, 1962 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hipage-co-v-united-states-cusc-1962.