Hiott v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
This text of 140 F. App'x 181 (Hiott v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff Linda L. Hiott appeals the judgment of the district court, arguing that the district court erred in granting Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment. We agree with the district court that even if we assume the stacked pictures that injured Plaintiff presented a hazard, there is no evidence that the Defendant had superior knowledge of the hazard. See Metts v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 269 Ga.App. 366, 604 S.E.2d 235, 237 (2004); Foodmax v. Fleming, 219 Ga.App. 469, 465 S.E.2d 489, 490 (1995). The judgment of the district court is, therefore,
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 F. App'x 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hiott-v-wal-mart-stores-inc-ca11-2005.