Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hios v. State

Hios v. State

586 So. 2d 510, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13959, 1991 WL 196306
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 4, 1991
DocketNo. 90-03513
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 586 So. 2d 510 (Hios v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hios v. State, 586 So. 2d 510, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13959, 1991 WL 196306 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of assault and of battery. He was sentenced to one year of probation for the battery count and six months probation for the assault, to run concurrently. However, the Adjudication and Probation Order and the Order of Probation indicate that the probation periods are to run consecutively.

We remand for correction of these orders to conform to the oral pronouncement of sentence, reflecting that the probation terms are concurrent. Otherwise, affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and CAMPBELL and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ALEX TORRES v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
586 So. 2d 510, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13959, 1991 WL 196306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hios-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.