Hio v. Younglove Casket Co.
206 A.D. 633, 198 N.Y.S. 585
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1923·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The only question raised is whether or not after the claim had been denied by the referee, the State Industrial Board could open the ease and grant further hearing. The referee decided, as a matter of fact, that there was not sufficient notice given in this case of the accident to excuse a written notice. Section 19 of the Labor Law
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hio v. Younglove Casket Co., 206 A.D. 633, 198 N.Y.S. 585 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).
206 A.D. 633 (Hio v. Younglove Casket Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Levine v. Comet Painting & Decorating Co.
31 N.E.2d 193 (New York Court of Appeals, 1940)