Hio v. Younglove Casket Co.

206 A.D. 633, 198 N.Y.S. 585
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1923
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 206 A.D. 633 (Hio v. Younglove Casket Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hio v. Younglove Casket Co., 206 A.D. 633, 198 N.Y.S. 585 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The only question raised is whether or not after the claim had been denied by the referee, the State Industrial Board could open the ease and grant further hearing. The referee decided, as a matter of fact, that there was not sufficient notice given in this case of the accident to excuse a written notice. Section 19 of the Labor Law

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Levine v. Comet Painting & Decorating Co.
31 N.E.2d 193 (New York Court of Appeals, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 A.D. 633, 198 N.Y.S. 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hio-v-younglove-casket-co-nyappdiv-1923.