Hintz v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

Eighth Circuit

Hintz v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

418 F. App'x 567

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJune 8, 2011

DocketNo. 10-3672

StatusPublished

This text of 418 F. App'x 567 (Hintz v. JP Morgan Chase Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hintz v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, 418 F. App'x 567 (8th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Hintz appeals the district court’s¹ Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal of his action raising claims under the Truth in Lending Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, and state law. Upon de novo review, we find no basis for reversal. See Detroit Gen. Ret. Sys. v. Medtronic, Inc., 621 F.3d 800, 804-05 (8th Cir.2010) (standard of review). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Hintz appeals the district court’s¹ Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal of his action raising claims under the Truth in Lending Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, and state law. Upon de novo review, we find no basis for reversal. See Detroit Gen. Ret. Sys. v. Medtronic, Inc., 621 F.3d 800, 804-05 (8th Cir.2010) (standard of review). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

418 F. App'x 567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hintz-v-jp-morgan-chase-bank-ca8-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack