Hintz v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

Eighth Circuit

Hintz v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

418 F. App'x 567

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided June 8, 2011·No. No. 10-3672·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Hintz appeals the district court’s¹ Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal of his action raising claims under the Truth in Lending Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, and state law. Upon de novo review, we find no basis for reversal. See Detroit Gen. Ret. Sys. v. Medtronic, Inc., 621 F.3d 800, 804-05 (8th Cir.2010) (standard of review). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Hintz appeals the district court’s¹ Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal of his action raising claims under the Truth in Lending Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, and state law. Upon de novo review, we find no basis for reversal. See Detroit Gen. Ret. Sys. v. Medtronic, Inc., 621 F.3d 800, 804-05 (8th Cir.2010) (standard of review). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Hintz v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, 418 F. App'x 567 (8th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

418 F. App'x 567 (Hintz v. JP Morgan Chase Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related