Hinton v. Youngblood
63 N.E.2d 196, 224 Ind. 16, 1946 Ind. LEXIS 89
Opinion
Relator seeks a writ of mandate to compel respondent to hear a petition for writ of error coram nobis. The response shows that the cause is not pending before respondent but before the judge who presided in the trial of the case at the time of relator’s conviction. Accordingly the petition is dismissed.
Note.—Reported in 63 N. E. (2d) *196.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hinton v. Youngblood, 63 N.E.2d 196, 224 Ind. 16, 1946 Ind. LEXIS 89 (Ind. 1946).
63 N.E.2d 196 (Hinton v. Youngblood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Joint County Park Board v. Verbarg
91 N.E.2d 916 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1950)