Hinton v. Whitehurst

4 S.E.2d 507, 216 N.C. 241, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 136
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hinton v. Whitehurst. Read the opinion of the Court — 214 N.C. 99
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 27, 1939·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After the entry of the various orders extending the time to file complaint, the defendants filed answer thereto and the cause was heard and determined upon its merits, resulting in the judgment cited in the complaint. We concur in the opinion of the court below that the complaint does not state a cause of action. The demurrer was properly sustained.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hinton v. Whitehurst, 4 S.E.2d 507, 216 N.C. 241, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 136 (N.C. 1939).

4 S.E.2d 507 (Hinton v. Whitehurst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.