Hinton v. Warden, United States Penitentiary-Hazelton

367 F. App'x 459
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2010·No. No. 09-8159·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Frank L. Hinton, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court and the magistrate judge. Hinton v. Warden, USP Hazelton, No. 2:09-cv-00096-REM-JES, 2009 WL 3762306 (N.D.W.Va., Nov. 9, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hinton v. Warden, United States Penitentiary-Hazelton, 367 F. App'x 459 (4th Cir. 2010).

367 F. App'x 459 (Hinton v. Warden, United States Penitentiary-Hazelton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241