Hinton v. State
This text of 144 S.W. 617 (Hinton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Appellant was indicted by the grand jury of Austin County, charged with assault to murder. When tried he was convicted of an aggravated assault.
The Assistant Attorney-General has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal because of the insufficiency of the recognizance. The recognizance merely states defendant has been convicted of the "offense of aggravated assault," and the motion must be sustained. Killingsworth v. State, 7 Texas Crim. App., 28.
The appeal is dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
144 S.W. 617, 65 Tex. Crim. 408, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinton-v-state-texcrimapp-1912.