Hinton v. State of Mississippi
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI EASTERN DIVISION
SHANNON ROCHELLE HINTON PETITIONER
v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-cv-102-TBM-BWR
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RESPONDENT
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This matter is before the Court on the submission of the Report and Recommendation [18] entered by United States Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on January 28, 2025. Judge Rath recommends granting the State of Mississippi’s Motion to Dismiss [11], dismissing Petitioner Shannon Rochelle Hinton’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [1] with prejudice, and denying Hinton a certificate of appealability. Hinton has not filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation, and the time for filing an objection has expired.1 “When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note to 1983 addition (citations omitted); see Casas v. Aduddell, 404 F. App’x 879, 881 (5th Cir. 2010) (“When a party fails timely to file written objections to the magistrate judge’s proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation, that party is barred from attacking on appeal the unobjected-to proposed findings and conclusions which the district court accepted, except for plain error”) (citing Douglass v. United Serv. Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Having considered Judge Rath’s Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that it is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law.
1 A copy of the Report and Recommendation [18] was mailed to Hinton at the address listed on the docket on January 28, 2025. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report and Recommendation [18] entered by United States Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on January 28, 2025, is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Petitioner Shannon Rochelle Hinton’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [1] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THIS, the 21st day of February, 2025. _____________________________ TAYLOR B. McNEEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hinton v. State of Mississippi (Hinton v. State of Mississippi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.