Hinton v. State
201 So. 2d 484, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4620
Opinion
Appellant urges reversal on the ground that it was reversible error for the prosecuting attorney to elicit, over objection on cross-examination of the defendant, that defendant had been convicted of a felony.
We have reviewed the record and considered the point in the light of the holding in Collins v. State, 155 Fla. 141, 19 So.2d 718 (1944) and have concluded that no reversible error has been made to appear.
.Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hinton v. State, 201 So. 2d 484, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4620 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).
201 So. 2d 484 (Hinton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Collins v. State
19 So. 2d 718 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1944)