Hinton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hinton v. State

201 So. 2d 484, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4620

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 25, 1967

DocketNo. 66-895

StatusPublished

This text of 201 So. 2d 484 (Hinton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hinton v. State, 201 So. 2d 484, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4620 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant urges reversal on the ground that it was reversible error for the prosecuting attorney to elicit, over objection on cross-examination of the defendant, that defendant had been convicted of a felony.

We have reviewed the record and considered the point in the light of the holding in Collins v. State, 155 Fla. 141, 19 So.2d 718 (1944) and have concluded that no reversible error has been made to appear.

.Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant urges reversal on the ground that it was reversible error for the prosecuting attorney to elicit, over objection on cross-examination of the defendant, that defendant had been convicted of a felony.

We have reviewed the record and considered the point in the light of the holding in Collins v. State, 155 Fla. 141, 19 So.2d 718 (1944) and have concluded that no reversible error has been made to appear.

.Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 So. 2d 484, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinton-v-state-fladistctapp-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack