Hinton v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.

435 So. 2d 571, 1983 La. App. LEXIS 8775
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJune 29, 1983
DocketNo. 83-88
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 435 So. 2d 571 (Hinton v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hinton v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co., 435 So. 2d 571, 1983 La. App. LEXIS 8775 (La. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

YELVERTON, Judge.

For the reasons stated in the companion case of Cheryl Isgitt Hinton, Individually and as Natural Tutrix v. Western Casualty and Surety Company, et al, 435 So.2d 568 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1983) in which a separate decision is being rendered by us this day, the judgment of the district court in the present case is reversed and set aside, and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings. Appellees, TOM’S Foods and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, will pay the costs of this appeal.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Foster v. American Deposit Ins. Co.
435 So. 2d 571 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1983)
Hinton v. Western Cas. and Sur. Co.
435 So. 2d 568 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
435 So. 2d 571, 1983 La. App. LEXIS 8775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinton-v-prudential-property-casualty-insurance-co-lactapp-1983.