Hinton v. Hinton

235 A.D. 869

This text of 235 A.D. 869 (Hinton v. Hinton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hinton v. Hinton, 235 A.D. 869 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Order denying plaintiff’s motion to punish the defendant for contempt modified by granting plaintiff permission to renew unless the defendant, beginning with the 1 st day of February, 1932, pay to the plaintiff sixty-five dollars a month, with the further leave to the plaintiff to renew the motion to punish the defendant for contempt for failure to pay all arrears at any time upon furnishing proof that the earning capacity of the defendant is greater than that stated by him in his affidavit submitted in opposition to the motion, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinton-v-hinton-nyappdiv-1932.