Hinton v. Hinton
886 So. 2d 336, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17167, 2004 WL 2559681
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 12, 2004·No. No. 5D03-4106·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The trial court’s order dated and filed November 18, 2003, is affirmed. We write to bring to the attention of the trial court that the order refers to an Exhibit “A” that was to be attached to the order but was inadvertently omitted. We remand for amendment of the order so that the missing Exhibit “A”, an amortization schedule, may be attached.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hinton v. Hinton, 886 So. 2d 336, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17167, 2004 WL 2559681 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
886 So. 2d 336 (Hinton v. Hinton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. State
886 So. 2d 336 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)