Hinton v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hinton v. Fischer

100 A.D.3d 1417, 953 N.Y.S.2d 446

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hinton v. Fischer. Read the opinion of the Court — 108 A.D.3d 1000 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 9, 2012·Published

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County [Samuel D. Hester, J.], entered October 27, 2011) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a tier III hearing that petitioner had violated various inmate rules.

It is hereby ordered that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed. Present — Fahey, J.P, Peradotto, Garni, Whalen and Martoche, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County [Samuel D. Hester, J.], entered October 27, 2011) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a tier III hearing that petitioner had violated various inmate rules.

It is hereby ordered that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed. Present — Fahey, J.P, Peradotto, Garni, Whalen and Martoche, JJ.

Hinton v. Fischer, 100 A.D.3d 1417, 953 N.Y.S.2d 446 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

100 A.D.3d 1417 (Hinton v. Fischer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.