Hinton v. First National Bank

53 So. 344, 98 Miss. 120
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1910·Published

Opinion

Whitfield, 0.

To an action in debt on a judgment regularly obtained, _ the defendant pleaded nil debet. The plaintiff demurred to this plea, and its demurrer was sustained, and judgment followéd for the plaintiff, and defendant appeals. If the defendant desired to plead payment, discharge, or release, of other like matter, it should have so specially pleaded. The plea of nil debet was simply an effort to relitigate the merits of the quesT tion of debt or no debt, and the demurrer was properly sustained. Affirmed.

Per Curiam. For the reasons indicated in the above opinion, that opinion is adopted as the opinion of the court, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hinton v. First National Bank, 53 So. 344, 98 Miss. 120 (Mich. 1910).

53 So. 344 (Hinton v. First National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.