Hinthia v. Lovelace's Admr.
This text of 5 Ky. Op. 687 (Hinthia v. Lovelace's Admr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
Whether a deficit of forty-four acres of land conveyed as “supposed” to contain 184 acres should entitle the vendee to compensation may depend on circumstances extrinsic as well as intrinsic, conducing to show fraud or gross mistake.
The answer in this case, alleging such mistake, avers that the vendor represented that the boundary sold contained 184 acres.
Such magnified representation as a fact not merely as an opinion might, if false, entitle the vendee to relief although the vendor may have believed what he said, for the assertion of a fact is equivalent to a warranty if the asserter did not know the truth of what he affirmed, and would be fraud if he knew it to be untrue.
The representation as averred should be traversed, and the demurrer to the answer ought therefore to have been overruled.
Wherefore the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Ky. Op. 687, 1871 Ky. LEXIS 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinthia-v-lovelaces-admr-kyctapp-1871.