Hinson v. State
66 Miss. 532
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
We find no error in the record. The evidence of what is called antecedent threats was properly excluded on two, grounds:
[537] First, because what is called a threat was no threat • and, second, because no overt act is shown which would have justified its introduction in evidence if it had been a threat.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hinson v. State, 66 Miss. 532 (Mich. 1889).
66 Miss. 532 (Hinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Vernon
2 So. 2d 629 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1941)
Owens v. State
80 Miss. 499 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1902)