Hinson v. Ogden
This text of 10 Mart. 389 (Hinson v. Ogden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court. This case presents the same features with several others decided this term. The appellees, in the failure of the appellants to prosecute their appeal in thirty days, have brought up the record, and have required [390]*390that the judgment should be affirmed with damages. Yeiser vs. Smith, ante 392 ; Ferguson & al. vs. Martin, id. 295 ; the same vs. Bacon, id. 303; Stephens vs. Smith, id. 333.
We think, from an inspection of the record, that the appeal has been evidently taken for delay; and it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the district court be affirmed with costs, and ten per cent. damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Mart. 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinson-v-ogden-la-1822.