Hinson v. McLaurin, Judge of Probate

185 S.E. 42, 180 S.C. 35, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 105
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMarch 27, 1936
Docket14261
StatusPublished

This text of 185 S.E. 42 (Hinson v. McLaurin, Judge of Probate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hinson v. McLaurin, Judge of Probate, 185 S.E. 42, 180 S.C. 35, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 105 (S.C. 1936).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Stabler.

This appeal is from an order of his Honor, Judge Dennis, who “confirmed in all particulars” the report of the Special Referee and gave judgment for the defendants.

We think the order should be affirmed. The appellant raises by her exceptions a number of questions, but we find no substantial merit in any of them. A careful study of the record discloses that the Referee, as held by the trial Judge, was correct in his findings and conclusions, and we approve his report and adopt it as the opinion of the Court. Let it be reported.

All exceptions are overruled, and the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Carter, Bonham, Baker, and FishburnE concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 S.E. 42, 180 S.C. 35, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinson-v-mclaurin-judge-of-probate-sc-1936.