Hinson v. Haynes

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hinson v. Haynes

98 S.E. 356, 23 Ga. App. 473, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 163

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 20, 1919

Docket9736

StatusPublished

This text of 98 S.E. 356 (Hinson v. Haynes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hinson v. Haynes, 98 S.E. 356, 23 Ga. App. 473, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 163 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. The evidence with all reasonable deductions therefrom demanded a verdict for the plaintiff, and the court did not err in so directing.

2. The court committed no error as allegel in the first and sixth grounds of the amendment to the motion for new trial,

3. The other special assignments of error do not properly raise any question for consideration by this court.

4. The motion of defendant in error that he be allowed damages against the plaintiff in error for prosecuting the case in this court is denied.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI