Hinson v. City of Columbia

Fourth Circuit

Hinson v. City of Columbia

564 F. App'x 11

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 31, 2014

DocketNo. 13-2292

StatusPublished

This text of 564 F. App'x 11 (Hinson v. City of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hinson v. City of Columbia, 564 F. App'x 11 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steven Hinson appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Columbia in his action alleging claims for failure to rehire and failure to accommodate pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hinson v. Columbia, No. 3:12-cv-01032-MBS, 2013 WL 5409140 (D.S.C. filed Sept. 24, 2013; entered Sept. 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steven Hinson appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Columbia in his action alleging claims for failure to rehire and failure to accommodate pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hinson v. Columbia, No. 3:12-cv-01032-MBS, 2013 WL 5409140 (D.S.C. filed Sept. 24, 2013; entered Sept. 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

564 F. App'x 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinson-v-city-of-columbia-ca4-2014.