Hinson v. Anderson Columbia Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hinson v. Anderson Columbia Co.

897 So. 2d 554, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4685, 2005 WL 771594

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 7, 2005

DocketNo. 1D04-4046

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 897 So. 2d 554 (Hinson v. Anderson Columbia Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hinson v. Anderson Columbia Co., 897 So. 2d 554, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4685, 2005 WL 771594 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Hinson appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary final judgment. Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists, after all reasonable inferences have been drawn in favor of the party opposing summary judgment. See Floyd v. Homes Beautiful Constr. Co., 710 So.2d 177, 179 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). Here, Appellant alleges the existence of a separate oral agreement which was different from the previous written agreement entered by the parties. Because the record fails to defeat this allegation, the order granting summary final judgment is REVERSED.

BARFIELD, BENTON, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

James Hinson appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary final judgment. Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists, after all reasonable inferences have been drawn in favor of the party opposing summary judgment. See Floyd v. Homes Beautiful Constr. Co., 710 So.2d 177, 179 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). Here, Appellant alleges the existence of a separate oral agreement which was different from the previous written agreement entered by the parties. Because the record fails to defeat this allegation, the order granting summary final judgment is REVERSED.

BARFIELD, BENTON, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

897 So. 2d 554, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4685, 2005 WL 771594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinson-v-anderson-columbia-co-fladistctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack