Hinshaw v. Joyce

105 S.E.2d 653, 249 N.C. 218, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 453
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 19, 1958·Published

Opinion

PeR Curiam.

The only assignments of error are the refusal to allow plaintiff’s motions to nonsuit the counterclaim and the refusal to set aside the verdict as contrary to the weight of the evidence.

The motion to nonsuit made at the close of defendant’s evidence was waived when plaintiff offered evidence for the purpose of defeating the counterclaim. G.S. 1-183.

There is evidence in the record to support each averment of the counterclaim. It is apparently conceded that the bulldozer was not a 1945 model as described in the bill of sale but was in fact manufactured prior to 1940. The truth of the evidence was a matter for the jury.

Whether a court should set aside a verdict as contrary to the weight of the evidence is a matter of discretion, and the refusal to exercise the discretion is not appealable. Walston v. Greene, 246 N.C. 617, 99 S.E. 2d 805.

Affirmed.

Paricer, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hinshaw v. Joyce, 105 S.E.2d 653, 249 N.C. 218, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 453 (N.C. 1958).

105 S.E.2d 653 (Hinshaw v. Joyce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walston v. Greene
99 S.E.2d 805 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)