Hinshaw v. Heavyweight Title Co

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 23, 2007·No. 06-2296·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-2296

ELIZABETH HINSHAW,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HEAVYWEIGHT TITLE COMPANY, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:06- cv-02340-JFM)

Submitted: June 27, 2007 Decided: July 23, 2007

Before KING and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Norris C. Ramsey, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. James T. Heidelbach, GEBHARDT & SMITH LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Elizabeth Hinshaw appeals the district court’s order

granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss her complaint pursuant

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See Hinshaw v. Heavyweight Title Co., Inc.,

No. 1:06-cv-02340-JFM (D. Md. Nov. 14, 2006). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hinshaw v. Heavyweight Title Co, (4th Cir. 2007).

Hinshaw v. Heavyweight Title Co (Hinshaw v. Heavyweight Title Co) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.