Hinshaw v. Heavyweight Title Co
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2296
ELIZABETH HINSHAW,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HEAVYWEIGHT TITLE COMPANY, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:06- cv-02340-JFM)
Submitted: June 27, 2007 Decided: July 23, 2007
Before KING and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Norris C. Ramsey, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. James T. Heidelbach, GEBHARDT & SMITH LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Elizabeth Hinshaw appeals the district court’s order
granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss her complaint pursuant
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Hinshaw v. Heavyweight Title Co., Inc.,
No. 1:06-cv-02340-JFM (D. Md. Nov. 14, 2006). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hinshaw v. Heavyweight Title Co (Hinshaw v. Heavyweight Title Co) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.