Hinojosa, Richard

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Hinojosa, Richard

DecidedAugust 11, 2006

DocketWR-46,974-02

StatusPublished

This text of Hinojosa, Richard (Hinojosa, Richard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hinojosa, Richard, (Tex. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

WR-46,974-02 EX PARTE RICHARD HINOJOSA ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

IN CAUSE NO. 1995CR4325 FROM THE

227^TH DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY

Per Curiam. Price, J., dissents for the reasons expressed in his dissent in Ex parte O'Brien, 190 S.W.3d 677 (Tex.Crim.App. 2006). Johnson, J., filed a dissenting statement.

ORDER

This is a subsequent application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 11.071, Section 5, and a Motion for Stay of Execution. Applicant asserts the chemical protocol used by the State of Texas could amount to the infliction of cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the United States Constitution.

Applicant was convicted of capital murder on July 25, 1997. This Court affirmed the conviction and sentence on direct appeal on October 27, 1999. Hinojosa v. State, 4 S.W.3d 240 (Tex.Crim.App. 1999). On July 20, 1999, applicant filed his initial application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Article 11.071. We denied relief. Ex parte Hinojosa, No. WR-46,974-01 (Tex.Crim.App. January 31, 2001). Applicant's subsequent application and motion for stay were filed in the convicting court on June 30, 2006.

We have reviewed applicant's second subsequent application and find that it should be dismissed. Ex parte O'Brien, 190 S.W.3d 677 (Tex.Crim.App. 2006). Applicant's motion for stay of execution is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 11th DAY OF August, 2006.

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

WR-46,974-02 EX PARTE RICHARD HINOJOSA ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

IN CAUSE NO. 1995CR4325 FROM THE

227^TH DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY

Per Curiam. Price, J., dissents for the reasons expressed in his dissent in Ex parte O'Brien, 190 S.W.3d 677 (Tex.Crim.App. 2006). Johnson, J., filed a dissenting statement.

ORDER

This is a subsequent application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 11.071, Section 5, and a Motion for Stay of Execution. Applicant asserts the chemical protocol used by the State of Texas could amount to the infliction of cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the United States Constitution.

Applicant was convicted of capital murder on July 25, 1997. This Court affirmed the conviction and sentence on direct appeal on October 27, 1999. Hinojosa v. State, 4 S.W.3d 240 (Tex.Crim.App. 1999). On July 20, 1999, applicant filed his initial application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Article 11.071. We denied relief. Ex parte Hinojosa, No. WR-46,974-01 (Tex.Crim.App. January 31, 2001). Applicant's subsequent application and motion for stay were filed in the convicting court on June 30, 2006.

We have reviewed applicant's second subsequent application and find that it should be dismissed. Ex parte O'Brien, 190 S.W.3d 677 (Tex.Crim.App. 2006). Applicant's motion for stay of execution is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 11th DAY OF August, 2006.

Do Not Publish

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Hinojosa, Richard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinojosa-richard-texcrimapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack