Hinkley v. Oriental Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Hinkley v. Oriental Refining Co.

178 P.2d 416, 116 Colo. 33, 1947 Colo. LEXIS 277

CourtSupreme Court of Colorado

DecidedFebruary 24, 1947

DocketNo. 15,608.

StatusPublished

This text of 178 P.2d 416 (Hinkley v. Oriental Refining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hinkley v. Oriental Refining Co., 178 P.2d 416, 116 Colo. 33, 1947 Colo. LEXIS 277 (Colo. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Mr. Justice Luxford has not participated in the hearing or in the consideration of this cause. Chief Justice Burke and Justices Stone and Alter are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, whereas Justices Hilliard, Jackson and Hays are of the opinion that it should be reversed. As the judgment must therefore be affirmed by operation of law because of an equally di *34 vided court, no good purpose would be served by a statement of the issues or the reasons for the conclusion of the several members of the court. Rule 118 (f), R. C.P. Colo.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Mr. Justice Luxford has not participated in the hearing or in the consideration of this cause. Chief Justice Burke and Justices Stone and Alter are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, whereas Justices Hilliard, Jackson and Hays are of the opinion that it should be reversed. As the judgment must therefore be affirmed by operation of law because of an equally di *34 vided court, no good purpose would be served by a statement of the issues or the reasons for the conclusion of the several members of the court. Rule 118 (f), R. C.P. Colo.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

178 P.2d 416, 116 Colo. 33, 1947 Colo. LEXIS 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinkley-v-oriental-refining-co-colo-1947.