Hinkle v. United States

115 F.2d 217, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 2843
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 25, 1940
DocketNos. 11705, 11707
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 115 F.2d 217 (Hinkle v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hinkle v. United States, 115 F.2d 217, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 2843 (8th Cir. 1940).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These are appeals from convictions under an indictment charging conspiracy to violate and for violation of section 223, Title 27 U.S.C.A., by transporting intoxicating liquors from the state of Arkansas into the state of Oklahoma. The contentions are that the statute of Oklahoma of 1939, 37 Okl.St.Ann. §§ 41^18, inclusive, is violative of the Constitution of Oklahoma, and that conceding its validity arguendo it does not bring the state of Oklahoma under the protection of the provisions of section 223, supra, of the federal statute.

The issues thus presented are controlled by the decision of this court in Hastings v. United States, 8 Cir., 115 F.2d 216, this day decided. On the authority of that decision, the judgments appealed from are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Yellow Cab Transit Co.
137 F.2d 274 (Tenth Circuit, 1943)
Harris v. State
1942 OK CR 29 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 F.2d 217, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 2843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinkle-v-united-states-ca8-1940.